<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Occupational disease</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=52605</link>
    <description>Section 36 establishes a rebuttable statutory presumption that diseases listed in the Third Schedule, when contracted by employees in specified employments (with required continuous service periods for Parts B and C), are employment injuries arising out of and in the course of employment; otherwise, benefits require direct attribution to a specific accidental injury, and the general presumption in section 34(1) does not apply to these cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:27:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:41:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Occupational disease</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=52605</link>
      <description>Section 36 establishes a rebuttable statutory presumption that diseases listed in the Third Schedule, when contracted by employees in specified employments (with required continuous service periods for Parts B and C), are employment injuries arising out of and in the course of employment; otherwise, benefits require direct attribution to a specific accidental injury, and the general presumption in section 34(1) does not apply to these cases.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Labour laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:27:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=52605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>