<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49289</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that co-heirs to an estate should be assessed individually, not as an association of individuals under the Hyderabad Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950. The respondent was found entitled to deductions for expenditure related to the maintenance of the estate under specific provisions of the Acts. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the individual assessment and allowing deductions for estate maintenance expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49289</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that co-heirs to an estate should be assessed individually, not as an association of individuals under the Hyderabad Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950. The respondent was found entitled to deductions for expenditure related to the maintenance of the estate under specific provisions of the Acts. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the individual assessment and allowing deductions for estate maintenance expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>