<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49287</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to the rebate claimed under the Merged States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1949. The court held that the benefits of section 14(2)(c) were not extended to residents of British India post-merger, and the denial of such benefits was a consequence of the merger of the states into British India. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 34 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49287</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, ruling that the appellant was not entitled to the rebate claimed under the Merged States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1949. The court held that the benefits of section 14(2)(c) were not extended to residents of British India post-merger, and the denial of such benefits was a consequence of the merger of the states into British India. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>