<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49285</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that both &quot;Capital paid in Surplus&quot; and &quot;earned surplus&quot; could be classified as reserves under the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947, based on the interpretation of the relevant rules. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49285</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that both &quot;Capital paid in Surplus&quot; and &quot;earned surplus&quot; could be classified as reserves under the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947, based on the interpretation of the relevant rules. The appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>