<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Electricity transmission network development, pro-rata and cable-shifting erection charges held exempt; service tax demand partly remanded, time-barred</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95940</link>
    <description>Charges collected as pro-rata and development charges for network development integral to electricity transmission were held covered by the statutory exemption for transmission of electricity as clarified by CBIC notifications/circulars; no service tax was payable on these amounts. Erection charges recovered from consumers for shifting overhead cables/wires were also treated as exempt under CBIC Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU; no service tax was payable on these receipts. For material cost and contingency charges, the computation required verification of requisite data; the matter was remanded for re-computation of any liability on these heads. The extended limitation period was held inapplicable as the department was aware of the facts from similar notices to other units; demand beyond the normal period was unsustainable. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:24:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:24:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Electricity transmission network development, pro-rata and cable-shifting erection charges held exempt; service tax demand partly remanded, time-barred</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95940</link>
      <description>Charges collected as pro-rata and development charges for network development integral to electricity transmission were held covered by the statutory exemption for transmission of electricity as clarified by CBIC notifications/circulars; no service tax was payable on these amounts. Erection charges recovered from consumers for shifting overhead cables/wires were also treated as exempt under CBIC Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU; no service tax was payable on these receipts. For material cost and contingency charges, the computation required verification of requisite data; the matter was remanded for re-computation of any liability on these heads. The extended limitation period was held inapplicable as the department was aware of the facts from similar notices to other units; demand beyond the normal period was unsustainable. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:24:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>