<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (10) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49284</link>
    <description>International-law immunity from Indian income-tax was rejected where the former State had no international personality and the merger covenant did not confer a tax exemption; the taxing statute, once extended to the merged territory, governed assessability. The Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 was treated as a rate-relief mechanism, not a blanket exemption for an ex-ruler, so no full exemption followed from former State non-liability. For specified Government securities, income-tax relief applied in the direct holding context, but the trust-held securities lost the private-property character needed for the notification-based exemption, so super-tax relief was unavailable there.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (10) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49284</link>
      <description>International-law immunity from Indian income-tax was rejected where the former State had no international personality and the merger covenant did not confer a tax exemption; the taxing statute, once extended to the merged territory, governed assessability. The Part B States (Taxation Concessions) Order, 1950 was treated as a rate-relief mechanism, not a blanket exemption for an ex-ruler, so no full exemption followed from former State non-liability. For specified Government securities, income-tax relief applied in the direct holding context, but the trust-held securities lost the private-property character needed for the notification-based exemption, so super-tax relief was unavailable there.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>