https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784769 Whether rejection of a recall application was justified where the appellant alleged lack of notice and denial of opportunity to file a counter. The NCLAT held that notice is meant to impart knowledge enabling an effective contest; once a party has knowledge and participates, the mode of service becomes immaterial. The record showed the appellant's representative repeatedly appeared, obtained time to file a reply, and yet failed to do so until the adjudicating authority closed the right to file counter; the plea of non-service was contradicted by the appellant's own filings and the order sheets. The recall rejection was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:31:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784769 Whether rejection of a recall application was justified where the appellant alleged lack of notice and denial of opportunity to file a counter. The NCLAT held that notice is meant to impart knowledge enabling an effective contest; once a party has knowledge and participates, the mode of service becomes immaterial. The record showed the appellant's representative repeatedly appeared, obtained time to file a reply, and yet failed to do so until the adjudicating authority closed the right to file counter; the plea of non-service was contradicted by the appellant's own filings and the order sheets. The recall rejection was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784769