<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 527 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784771</link>
    <description>A financial creditor challenged rejection of its claim in CIRP and sought relief under s.60(5) IBC, relying on acknowledgments in the corporate debtor&#039;s audited balance sheet and an email showing takeover of a third party loan, further corroborated by admissions made by a promoter/personal guarantor in pending proceedings. The AT held that these materials established existence and acknowledgment of debt; however, the creditor failed to challenge the RP&#039;s rejection with due diligence, and the CIRP had progressed to CoC approval of a resolution plan awaiting AA approval. Reopening the time-bound process at such a belated stage was declined, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 527 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784771</link>
      <description>A financial creditor challenged rejection of its claim in CIRP and sought relief under s.60(5) IBC, relying on acknowledgments in the corporate debtor&#039;s audited balance sheet and an email showing takeover of a third party loan, further corroborated by admissions made by a promoter/personal guarantor in pending proceedings. The AT held that these materials established existence and acknowledgment of debt; however, the creditor failed to challenge the RP&#039;s rejection with due diligence, and the CIRP had progressed to CoC approval of a resolution plan awaiting AA approval. Reopening the time-bound process at such a belated stage was declined, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>