https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784775 The dominant issue was whether the NCLT could entertain a petition under s.59 of the Companies Act, 2013 for rectification of the register of members when disputes regarding authenticity of share-transfer documents were pending before a civil court. Applying s.430 and the NCLAT ruling in a prior precedent that civil-court jurisdiction is barred in matters the Tribunal is empowered to determine, the NCLAT held that the NCLT's rectificatory jurisdiction extends even to contested facts and disputed questions and cannot be deferred awaiting a civil-court adjudication. The impugned dismissal was set aside on this jurisdictional error and the matter was remanded to the NCLT for decision on merits. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:59:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784775 The dominant issue was whether the NCLT could entertain a petition under s.59 of the Companies Act, 2013 for rectification of the register of members when disputes regarding authenticity of share-transfer documents were pending before a civil court. Applying s.430 and the NCLAT ruling in a prior precedent that civil-court jurisdiction is barred in matters the Tribunal is empowered to determine, the NCLAT held that the NCLT's rectificatory jurisdiction extends even to contested facts and disputed questions and cannot be deferred awaiting a civil-court adjudication. The impugned dismissal was set aside on this jurisdictional error and the matter was remanded to the NCLT for decision on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784775