<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49278</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the dividend income of the assessee, an investment company, should be assessed under section 12 and not section 10 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Therefore, the losses from preceding years could not be set off against the dividend income. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49278</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the dividend income of the assessee, an investment company, should be assessed under section 12 and not section 10 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Therefore, the losses from preceding years could not be set off against the dividend income. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>