<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 557 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784801</link>
    <description>A 730-day delay in filing the special leave petition was not satisfactorily explained, and the Court found no justification to condone such a long delay. The application for condonation of delay was therefore dismissed, and the special leave petition was also dismissed with costs. The operative effect was that the challenge to the High Court&#039;s decision was not entertained on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 557 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784801</link>
      <description>A 730-day delay in filing the special leave petition was not satisfactorily explained, and the Court found no justification to condone such a long delay. The application for condonation of delay was therefore dismissed, and the special leave petition was also dismissed with costs. The operative effect was that the challenge to the High Court&#039;s decision was not entertained on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>