<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 559 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784803</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the SC should entertain a Special Leave Petition filed with a 359-day delay challenging an HC order that quashed reassessment proceedings against a corporate debtor post-IBC resolution. The SC held that the delay was gross and remained unsatisfactorily explained; consequently, the petition was not entertained and was dismissed on limitation. Independently, the SC found no substantial ground to interfere with the HC&#039;s determination that reassessment proceedings could not be sustained in the circumstances following approval of a resolution plan under s.31 IBC; consequently, the petition was also dismissed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 559 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784803</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the SC should entertain a Special Leave Petition filed with a 359-day delay challenging an HC order that quashed reassessment proceedings against a corporate debtor post-IBC resolution. The SC held that the delay was gross and remained unsatisfactorily explained; consequently, the petition was not entertained and was dismissed on limitation. Independently, the SC found no substantial ground to interfere with the HC&#039;s determination that reassessment proceedings could not be sustained in the circumstances following approval of a resolution plan under s.31 IBC; consequently, the petition was also dismissed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>