<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (3) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49274</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, determining that the enhancement of taxes by the Notified Area Committee exceeded constitutional limits, rendering it ultra vires and illegal. The Court held that the appellant&#039;s suit for the recovery of excess tax was maintainable, emphasizing the jurisdiction of civil courts in cases of constitutional violations over the exclusive remedies provided under the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (3) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49274</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, determining that the enhancement of taxes by the Notified Area Committee exceeded constitutional limits, rendering it ultra vires and illegal. The Court held that the appellant&#039;s suit for the recovery of excess tax was maintainable, emphasizing the jurisdiction of civil courts in cases of constitutional violations over the exclusive remedies provided under the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>