<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2199 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465825</link>
    <description>Electronic bid submission was treated as complete when the bid data entered the addressee&#039;s designated computer resource before the tender deadline and moved beyond the bidder&#039;s control. Forensic reports showed the last file was uploaded on the respondent&#039;s portal before 14:00 hours, and the petitioner&#039;s server reflected immediate follow-on activity, supporting timely transmission under the rule on dispatch and receipt of electronic records. The absence of a matching server log on the respondent&#039;s side did not undo an already completed electronic submission. The bidder was entitled to be treated as having submitted a valid bid within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 11:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2199 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465825</link>
      <description>Electronic bid submission was treated as complete when the bid data entered the addressee&#039;s designated computer resource before the tender deadline and moved beyond the bidder&#039;s control. Forensic reports showed the last file was uploaded on the respondent&#039;s portal before 14:00 hours, and the petitioner&#039;s server reflected immediate follow-on activity, supporting timely transmission under the rule on dispatch and receipt of electronic records. The absence of a matching server log on the respondent&#039;s side did not undo an already completed electronic submission. The bidder was entitled to be treated as having submitted a valid bid within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>