<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49269</link>
    <description>The court held that the rental income received by the insurance company from its property was not exempt under section 4(3)(xii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, due to the specific assessment rules for insurance businesses under section 10(7). The court affirmed the decision of the High Court, dismissing the appeals and awarding costs against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 43 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49269</link>
      <description>The court held that the rental income received by the insurance company from its property was not exempt under section 4(3)(xii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, due to the specific assessment rules for insurance businesses under section 10(7). The court affirmed the decision of the High Court, dismissing the appeals and awarding costs against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>