<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49267</link>
    <description>Commission paid to an assessee was exempt under the relevant notification because all three cumulative conditions were met: it was paid out of business profits, it had not been allowed as a deduction and was included in the employer&#039;s taxable profits, and income-tax had been assessed on those profits as business income. The notification was applied to avoid double taxation of the same income, and the commission was therefore exempt in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49267</link>
      <description>Commission paid to an assessee was exempt under the relevant notification because all three cumulative conditions were met: it was paid out of business profits, it had not been allowed as a deduction and was included in the employer&#039;s taxable profits, and income-tax had been assessed on those profits as business income. The notification was applied to avoid double taxation of the same income, and the commission was therefore exempt in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>