https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49264 A reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 may properly be refused when the proposed question is already concluded by binding Supreme Court authority and is therefore academic. The text also states that where a karta enters a partnership on behalf of a Hindu undivided family and the allowance is obtained through the use of joint family funds, the receipt is not a personal emolument. It is treated as family income when it is directly traceable to the family's contribution and inseparably connected with the partnership arrangement. en-us Thu, 09 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49264 A reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 may properly be refused when the proposed question is already concluded by binding Supreme Court authority and is therefore academic. The text also states that where a karta enters a partnership on behalf of a Hindu undivided family and the allowance is obtained through the use of joint family funds, the receipt is not a personal emolument. It is treated as family income when it is directly traceable to the family's contribution and inseparably connected with the partnership arrangement. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49264