<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax adjudication ignored taxpayer&#039;s hearing and objections, violating natural justice; order set aside, remand tied to 50% pre-deposit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95929</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was breach of principles of natural justice in a tax adjudication order. The authority failed to consider the taxpayer&#039;s attendance at an earlier personal hearing and the documents/objections submitted, and the order did not address the defects raised, rendering it unsustainable; consequently, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for a fresh decision on merits. To balance equities given the taxpayer&#039;s belated approach, remand was made conditional on pre-deposit of 50% of the disputed tax in cash within 30 days, failing which the benefit would not enure; upon compliance, bank attachment would stand vacated and a fresh order was directed within three months. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:50:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax adjudication ignored taxpayer&#039;s hearing and objections, violating natural justice; order set aside, remand tied to 50% pre-deposit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95929</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was breach of principles of natural justice in a tax adjudication order. The authority failed to consider the taxpayer&#039;s attendance at an earlier personal hearing and the documents/objections submitted, and the order did not address the defects raised, rendering it unsustainable; consequently, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for a fresh decision on merits. To balance equities given the taxpayer&#039;s belated approach, remand was made conditional on pre-deposit of 50% of the disputed tax in cash within 30 days, failing which the benefit would not enure; upon compliance, bank attachment would stand vacated and a fresh order was directed within three months. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:50:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>