https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784733 Where the Customs Act provides a specific statutory appeal against an adverse Customs Authority for Advance Ruling order, an aggrieved party must ordinarily pursue that appellate remedy rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. The Madras HC held that the existence of an effective appeal under Section 28-KA barred the writ petition, and the petition was therefore not maintainable. The court dismissed the writ challenge on the ground that the statutory remedy had to be exhausted first. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:26:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784733 Where the Customs Act provides a specific statutory appeal against an adverse Customs Authority for Advance Ruling order, an aggrieved party must ordinarily pursue that appellate remedy rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. The Madras HC held that the existence of an effective appeal under Section 28-KA barred the writ petition, and the petition was therefore not maintainable. The court dismissed the writ challenge on the ground that the statutory remedy had to be exhausted first. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784733