<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 502 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784746</link>
    <description>Whether GST exemption under Notification No. 16/2025-Central Tax (Rate) dated 17.9.2025 applied to a group health insurance policy was the dominant issue. The HC held that, under IRDAI (Health Insurance) Regulations, 2016, a group cannot be formed solely to procure insurance and must have an identifiable relationship between members and the group policyholder; issuance by a regulated insurer to a large, relationship-based group indicated compliance with these requirements. The policy arose from a bipartite settlement and collective bargaining through an association, evidencing a genuine group arrangement rather than individual coverage. Consequently, the notification was construed as exempting only individual policies, not such group policies, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 502 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784746</link>
      <description>Whether GST exemption under Notification No. 16/2025-Central Tax (Rate) dated 17.9.2025 applied to a group health insurance policy was the dominant issue. The HC held that, under IRDAI (Health Insurance) Regulations, 2016, a group cannot be formed solely to procure insurance and must have an identifiable relationship between members and the group policyholder; issuance by a regulated insurer to a large, relationship-based group indicated compliance with these requirements. The policy arose from a bipartite settlement and collective bargaining through an association, evidencing a genuine group arrangement rather than individual coverage. Consequently, the notification was construed as exempting only individual policies, not such group policies, and the writ petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>