https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784676 The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging initiation of CIRP on grounds of absence of legally enforceable debt, invalid assignment, and forged/fabricated documents was barred by the IBC's jurisdictional ouster. The HC held that allegations of fraud, forgery, malicious initiation, and veracity of documents can be examined by the NCLT under ss. 65 and 75, and as incidental/ancillary questions under s. 60(5)(c) read with the NCLT Rules; the inability of the NCLT to decide such matters at the admission stage under s. 7 does not permit parallel civil adjudication, and ss. 63 and 231 bar collateral civil attacks. Consequently, the plaint was rejected under O.VII R.11 CPC. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 10:01:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784676 The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging initiation of CIRP on grounds of absence of legally enforceable debt, invalid assignment, and forged/fabricated documents was barred by the IBC's jurisdictional ouster. The HC held that allegations of fraud, forgery, malicious initiation, and veracity of documents can be examined by the NCLT under ss. 65 and 75, and as incidental/ancillary questions under s. 60(5)(c) read with the NCLT Rules; the inability of the NCLT to decide such matters at the admission stage under s. 7 does not permit parallel civil adjudication, and ss. 63 and 231 bar collateral civil attacks. Consequently, the plaint was rejected under O.VII R.11 CPC. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784676