https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784688 A writ petition challenging an advance ruling on customs classification was not maintainable where the Customs Act provided a statutory appellate remedy under Section 28-KA. The Madras High Court followed its earlier ruling that the availability of an effective appeal bars recourse to writ jurisdiction against such orders. The result was dismissal of the writ challenge on maintainability grounds, without displacing the statutory appellate route. en-us Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784688 A writ petition challenging an advance ruling on customs classification was not maintainable where the Customs Act provided a statutory appellate remedy under Section 28-KA. The Madras High Court followed its earlier ruling that the availability of an effective appeal bars recourse to writ jurisdiction against such orders. The result was dismissal of the writ challenge on maintainability grounds, without displacing the statutory appellate route. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784688