<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784712</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether amounts received by a Netherlands tax resident from Indian airline customers constituted &quot;royalty&quot; taxable in India under s.9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The tribunal held that royalty under the DTAA required granting use or a right to use intellectual property or providing a secret process/formula to the Indian customers; on facts, no such rights or secret process were made available. It further held that expanded domestic-law definitions of royalty cannot be automatically imported into the DTAA, following HC precedent. Consequently, the receipts were not royalty under Article 12(4) and were not taxable in India, and the taxpayer was justified in not offering them to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 468 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784712</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether amounts received by a Netherlands tax resident from Indian airline customers constituted &quot;royalty&quot; taxable in India under s.9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA. The tribunal held that royalty under the DTAA required granting use or a right to use intellectual property or providing a secret process/formula to the Indian customers; on facts, no such rights or secret process were made available. It further held that expanded domestic-law definitions of royalty cannot be automatically imported into the DTAA, following HC precedent. Consequently, the receipts were not royalty under Article 12(4) and were not taxable in India, and the taxpayer was justified in not offering them to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>