<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 33 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49248</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning the interpretation of section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, which mandates new machinery or plant for allowance. This ruling aligned with a prior case where engine replacements were deemed eligible for allowance under a comparable provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 33 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49248</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning the interpretation of section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, which mandates new machinery or plant for allowance. This ruling aligned with a prior case where engine replacements were deemed eligible for allowance under a comparable provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>