<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cotton waste sales for open-ended spinning treated as &quot;scrap&quot; for s.206C TCS, remanded for end-use verification relief</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95903</link>
    <description>Cotton waste sold by the assessee was treated by the AO as &quot;scrap&quot; liable to TCS under s. 206C. Interpreting the statutory definition of &quot;scrap,&quot; the tribunal held that cotton waste used as raw material in open-ended spinning mills does not qualify as scrap, so s. 206C is inapplicable on such sales. Although the first appellate authority accepted non-taxability in principle, it denied relief for non-furnishing of Form 27C; the tribunal treated this as a curable technical lapse in light of binding precedent and noted that end-user declarations were produced. The matter was remitted to the AO to verify end-use and then allow relief accordingly; appeal was statistically allowed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cotton waste sales for open-ended spinning treated as &quot;scrap&quot; for s.206C TCS, remanded for end-use verification relief</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95903</link>
      <description>Cotton waste sold by the assessee was treated by the AO as &quot;scrap&quot; liable to TCS under s. 206C. Interpreting the statutory definition of &quot;scrap,&quot; the tribunal held that cotton waste used as raw material in open-ended spinning mills does not qualify as scrap, so s. 206C is inapplicable on such sales. Although the first appellate authority accepted non-taxability in principle, it denied relief for non-furnishing of Form 27C; the tribunal treated this as a curable technical lapse in light of binding precedent and noted that end-user declarations were produced. The matter was remitted to the AO to verify end-use and then allow relief accordingly; appeal was statistically allowed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>