<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 32 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49247</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders. The Sales Tax Officer&#039;s assessments were deemed capricious and lacking a legal basis, emphasizing the necessity for assessments to be supported by relevant material. The judgment clarified the limits of best judgment assessments under the Act and affirmed the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction in reviewing such assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 32 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49247</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders. The Sales Tax Officer&#039;s assessments were deemed capricious and lacking a legal basis, emphasizing the necessity for assessments to be supported by relevant material. The judgment clarified the limits of best judgment assessments under the Act and affirmed the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction in reviewing such assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>