<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported gold bars on consignment sale: can post-import remittances raise transaction value u/s14? Declared value upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95895</link>
    <description>Differential duty demand on imported gold bars under a &quot;consignment sale&quot; arrangement was examined on whether post-import remittances to the overseas supplier reflected a &quot;sale&quot; after import affecting transaction value under s.14. The Tribunal held valuation must follow CVR, 2007 sequentially; where declared value is based on the contemporaneous LBMA/LME-linked price, it constitutes the value of similar goods under Rule 5 and satisfies s.14, and Revenue having not disputed the benchmark could not revalue goods by adding post-import charges. Consequently, the declared bill of entry value was upheld, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief; similar cases may be considered consistently as per law. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported gold bars on consignment sale: can post-import remittances raise transaction value u/s14? Declared value upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95895</link>
      <description>Differential duty demand on imported gold bars under a &quot;consignment sale&quot; arrangement was examined on whether post-import remittances to the overseas supplier reflected a &quot;sale&quot; after import affecting transaction value under s.14. The Tribunal held valuation must follow CVR, 2007 sequentially; where declared value is based on the contemporaneous LBMA/LME-linked price, it constitutes the value of similar goods under Rule 5 and satisfies s.14, and Revenue having not disputed the benchmark could not revalue goods by adding post-import charges. Consequently, the declared bill of entry value was upheld, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief; similar cases may be considered consistently as per law. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:25:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>