https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465794 A foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is enforceable and executable in the same proceeding and, once held enforceable, operates as a decree. The Court held that pending pre-amendment Section 34 challenge proceedings, including interim and stay orders, effectively kept enforceability in abeyance, so limitation for enforcement did not run during that period. It further held that the condonation of delay in the Section 34 matter related back to the filing date, and the award became enforceable only when the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and held the Section 34 petition not maintainable. On that basis, the enforcement petition was within limitation and maintainable. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:03:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465794 A foreign award under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is enforceable and executable in the same proceeding and, once held enforceable, operates as a decree. The Court held that pending pre-amendment Section 34 challenge proceedings, including interim and stay orders, effectively kept enforceability in abeyance, so limitation for enforcement did not run during that period. It further held that the condonation of delay in the Section 34 matter related back to the filing date, and the award became enforceable only when the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and held the Section 34 petition not maintainable. On that basis, the enforcement petition was within limitation and maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465794