<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1745 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465795</link>
    <description>In land acquisition compensation enhancement, the dominant issue was whether statutory interest is payable on the enhanced compensation for the period attributable to the claimants&#039; delay in pursuing appellate remedies. Applying SC precedents holding that a beneficiary of parity-based enhancement cannot saddle a public body with interest for a delay not attributable to it, the Court ruled that interest must be denied for the delayed period even if no such condition was expressly imposed when delay was excused. The HC&#039;s grant of interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay was set aside and the HC order was modified accordingly; the appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1745 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465795</link>
      <description>In land acquisition compensation enhancement, the dominant issue was whether statutory interest is payable on the enhanced compensation for the period attributable to the claimants&#039; delay in pursuing appellate remedies. Applying SC precedents holding that a beneficiary of parity-based enhancement cannot saddle a public body with interest for a delay not attributable to it, the Court ruled that interest must be denied for the delayed period even if no such condition was expressly imposed when delay was excused. The HC&#039;s grant of interest on the enhanced compensation for the period of delay was set aside and the HC order was modified accordingly; the appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>