<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49242</link>
    <description>Deduction of income-tax in computing available surplus for bonus cannot be taken notionally; an employer must prove that the tax was in fact levied for the year, otherwise the notional deduction is disallowed. The tribunal&#039;s grant of a limited rehabilitation allowance at Rs. 1,00,000 for the year in dispute is upheld as a discretionary, evidence-based assessment, including reliance on the employer&#039;s earlier representation and conduct; the larger claim is rejected, though fresh evidence may be permitted in future references.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49242</link>
      <description>Deduction of income-tax in computing available surplus for bonus cannot be taken notionally; an employer must prove that the tax was in fact levied for the year, otherwise the notional deduction is disallowed. The tribunal&#039;s grant of a limited rehabilitation allowance at Rs. 1,00,000 for the year in dispute is upheld as a discretionary, evidence-based assessment, including reliance on the employer&#039;s earlier representation and conduct; the larger claim is rejected, though fresh evidence may be permitted in future references.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>