https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465796 Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 bars civil court intervention in matters falling within the DRT or DRAT domain, including steps taken against secured assets, with only a narrow exception for fraud or claims so untenable that no inquiry is needed. The statutory remedies under Sections 17 and 18 remain available to the aggrieved party, so civil injunctive relief cannot ordinarily restrain a secured creditor from proceeding under the Act. In interlocutory matters, appellate interference with a discretionary injunction order is limited to cases of perversity, arbitrariness, or error in principle; a reasoned order vacating interim protection should not be displaced merely because another view is possible. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 19:03:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465796 Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 bars civil court intervention in matters falling within the DRT or DRAT domain, including steps taken against secured assets, with only a narrow exception for fraud or claims so untenable that no inquiry is needed. The statutory remedies under Sections 17 and 18 remain available to the aggrieved party, so civil injunctive relief cannot ordinarily restrain a secured creditor from proceeding under the Act. In interlocutory matters, appellate interference with a discretionary injunction order is limited to cases of perversity, arbitrariness, or error in principle; a reasoned order vacating interim protection should not be displaced merely because another view is possible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465796