<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49227</link>
    <description>The assessment of unaccounted yarn could not rest on selected registers alone where the assessee maintained interconnected books covering cotton purchase, yarn production, reeling, cloth production and sale contracts. A fact-finding authority must examine all relevant records, accept or reject them for cogent reasons, and address the assessee&#039;s explanation that the sale contract figures were only estimates and that actual cloth production reflected the true position. The matter required a fresh enquiry on the entire material, and the assessment on this point was remitted for reconsideration, with tax liability not to be increased beyond the original assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49227</link>
      <description>The assessment of unaccounted yarn could not rest on selected registers alone where the assessee maintained interconnected books covering cotton purchase, yarn production, reeling, cloth production and sale contracts. A fact-finding authority must examine all relevant records, accept or reject them for cogent reasons, and address the assessee&#039;s explanation that the sale contract figures were only estimates and that actual cloth production reflected the true position. The matter required a fresh enquiry on the entire material, and the assessment on this point was remitted for reconsideration, with tax liability not to be increased beyond the original assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>