https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784636 In a PMLA bail matter, the HC held that prolonged incarceration, extensive prosecution evidence, and no realistic prospect of early trial could justify bail despite the stringent twin conditions in Section 45. The delay in framing charge was not attributable to the applicant, and the predicate offence trial had not commenced, so continued detention would impair the right to personal liberty and speedy trial under Article 21. The Court applied the principle that constitutional jurisdiction can operate alongside special statutory bail restrictions where detention has become unjustified. Bail was granted and the Section 45 conditions were treated as satisfied in the applicant's favour. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jan 2026 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784636 In a PMLA bail matter, the HC held that prolonged incarceration, extensive prosecution evidence, and no realistic prospect of early trial could justify bail despite the stringent twin conditions in Section 45. The delay in framing charge was not attributable to the applicant, and the predicate offence trial had not commenced, so continued detention would impair the right to personal liberty and speedy trial under Article 21. The Court applied the principle that constitutional jurisdiction can operate alongside special statutory bail restrictions where detention has become unjustified. Bail was granted and the Section 45 conditions were treated as satisfied in the applicant's favour. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784636