https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465770 Civil court jurisdiction remains available for a suit for permanent injunction based on possession and land identification unless expressly or impliedly barred by statute; a revenue-law exclusion did not cover a simpliciter possession dispute, so the maintainability objection failed. In second appeal, Section 100 CPC requires substantial questions of law to be framed only when such questions actually arise; where none arose, the appeal could be dismissed without framing them. Refusal to admit additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 was also upheld because the documents did not bear on the disputed factual controversy already tried below. en-us Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jan 2026 11:56:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465770 Civil court jurisdiction remains available for a suit for permanent injunction based on possession and land identification unless expressly or impliedly barred by statute; a revenue-law exclusion did not cover a simpliciter possession dispute, so the maintainability objection failed. In second appeal, Section 100 CPC requires substantial questions of law to be framed only when such questions actually arise; where none arose, the appeal could be dismissed without framing them. Refusal to admit additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 was also upheld because the documents did not bear on the disputed factual controversy already tried below. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465770