https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465773 The dominant issue was whether the applicant could maintain an appeal against directions requiring disclosure of documents/information in a court-monitored money-laundering investigation and whether such directions were impermissible fact-finding. The HC held that the directions merely sought essential material for a fair investigation, especially where the agency admitted inability to file a proper report for want of such material; monitoring must ensure fairness and expedition without adverse remarks prejudicing persons under investigation. It further held the applicant was not an aggrieved person because no prejudicial observations appeared in the impugned orders, and alleged remarks in a transcript were irrelevant. The applicant was directed to furnish all sought material by the stipulated date, and the appeal and connected applications were disposed of. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jan 2026 11:41:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465773 The dominant issue was whether the applicant could maintain an appeal against directions requiring disclosure of documents/information in a court-monitored money-laundering investigation and whether such directions were impermissible fact-finding. The HC held that the directions merely sought essential material for a fair investigation, especially where the agency admitted inability to file a proper report for want of such material; monitoring must ensure fairness and expedition without adverse remarks prejudicing persons under investigation. It further held the applicant was not an aggrieved person because no prejudicial observations appeared in the impugned orders, and alleged remarks in a transcript were irrelevant. The applicant was directed to furnish all sought material by the stipulated date, and the appeal and connected applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465773