https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465774 Whether additional documents could be taken on record in a s.9 IBC proceeding despite not being filed with the reply was the dominant issue. The NCLT held that, at the stage of considering an application to receive documents, it need not assess relevancy; admissibility, proof, and relevance are to be evaluated at final adjudication. Since arguments had not yet been advanced, the Tribunal found it appropriate to permit filing, while noting the documents ought to have accompanied the reply. The application was allowed and the documents were taken on record subject to proof and relevance. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jan 2026 21:13:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465774 Whether additional documents could be taken on record in a s.9 IBC proceeding despite not being filed with the reply was the dominant issue. The NCLT held that, at the stage of considering an application to receive documents, it need not assess relevancy; admissibility, proof, and relevance are to be evaluated at final adjudication. Since arguments had not yet been advanced, the Tribunal found it appropriate to permit filing, while noting the documents ought to have accompanied the reply. The application was allowed and the documents were taken on record subject to proof and relevance. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465774