<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 85 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49209</link>
    <description>The judgment favored the applicants by setting aside the lower authority&#039;s orders regarding rebate confirmation, penalty imposition, and personal penalties. The court found no evidence of fraudulent activity in obtaining rebates, emphasizing compliance with procedures supervised by excise officers. Recommendations by investigative agencies and a circular providing relaxation for rebate claims supported the decision to provide consequential relief to the applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 85 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49209</link>
      <description>The judgment favored the applicants by setting aside the lower authority&#039;s orders regarding rebate confirmation, penalty imposition, and personal penalties. The court found no evidence of fraudulent activity in obtaining rebates, emphasizing compliance with procedures supervised by excise officers. Recommendations by investigative agencies and a circular providing relaxation for rebate claims supported the decision to provide consequential relief to the applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>