<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465766</link>
    <description>Ongoing investigation should ordinarily not be disrupted by premature judicial directions or adverse comments, because statements to police and police diary material have only limited use at trial under Sections 162 and 172 CrPC. Disclosure of diary records and interference with investigative steps were considered premature while the inquiry remained in progress. Courts should avoid orders that may hamper, derail, or demoralise an active investigation, and the investigating agency must be allowed to act efficiently and vigilantly without pressure. On that basis, the challenge to the High Court&#039;s order was rejected and no relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 325 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465766</link>
      <description>Ongoing investigation should ordinarily not be disrupted by premature judicial directions or adverse comments, because statements to police and police diary material have only limited use at trial under Sections 162 and 172 CrPC. Disclosure of diary records and interference with investigative steps were considered premature while the inquiry remained in progress. Courts should avoid orders that may hamper, derail, or demoralise an active investigation, and the investigating agency must be allowed to act efficiently and vigilantly without pressure. On that basis, the challenge to the High Court&#039;s order was rejected and no relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>