https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49192 The revision application was filed against the rejection of a rebate claim on Central Excise duty for cotton fabrics used in manufacturing exported articles due to discrepancies in goods description. The appellate authority upheld the rejection based on discrepancies but noted matching details in export documents. The Government, considering the detailed content consistency in all export documents, allowed the revision application, ultimately granting the rebate claim on Central Excise duty paid on cotton fabrics for export. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:39:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49192 The revision application was filed against the rejection of a rebate claim on Central Excise duty for cotton fabrics used in manufacturing exported articles due to discrepancies in goods description. The appellate authority upheld the rejection based on discrepancies but noted matching details in export documents. The Government, considering the detailed content consistency in all export documents, allowed the revision application, ultimately granting the rebate claim on Central Excise duty paid on cotton fabrics for export. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49192