<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 384 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784628</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was breach of natural justice in GST assessment where the SCN was served only by portal upload and the assessee claimed unawareness and no personal hearing was afforded. The HC held that while portal upload is a valid mode of service, persistent non-response should have prompted the officer to apply mind and attempt alternate statutory modes under s.169(1), preferably RPAD, to ensure effective service; passing an ex parte order on &quot;empty formalities&quot; was impermissible. The impugned assessment order was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, conditional on the assessee paying 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, with setting aside to take effect upon such payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:22:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 384 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784628</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was breach of natural justice in GST assessment where the SCN was served only by portal upload and the assessee claimed unawareness and no personal hearing was afforded. The HC held that while portal upload is a valid mode of service, persistent non-response should have prompted the officer to apply mind and attempt alternate statutory modes under s.169(1), preferably RPAD, to ensure effective service; passing an ex parte order on &quot;empty formalities&quot; was impermissible. The impugned assessment order was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, conditional on the assessee paying 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, with setting aside to take effect upon such payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>