<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 316 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784560</link>
    <description>Dishonour of cheque proceedings involved admission of an appeal subject to pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act. The petitioners sought relief by invoking Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, but no exceptional circumstance or special reason was shown to depart from the pre-deposit requirement. The Supreme Court, after considering the facts and hearing senior counsel, was not persuaded to interfere and dismissed the SLP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 316 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784560</link>
      <description>Dishonour of cheque proceedings involved admission of an appeal subject to pre-deposit of the compensation award under Section 148 of the NI Act. The petitioners sought relief by invoking Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, but no exceptional circumstance or special reason was shown to depart from the pre-deposit requirement. The Supreme Court, after considering the facts and hearing senior counsel, was not persuaded to interfere and dismissed the SLP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>