<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 328 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784572</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Court reconsidered bail by noting that similarly placed co-accused had already been released and that trial completion was likely to take time. On those factors, continued custody was found unwarranted, and the appellants were held entitled to bail. The refusal order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 328 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784572</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Court reconsidered bail by noting that similarly placed co-accused had already been released and that trial completion was likely to take time. On those factors, continued custody was found unwarranted, and the appellants were held entitled to bail. The refusal order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>