https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784580 The dominant issue was whether an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 could be entertained despite being filed 132 days late. The SC held that the appellate tribunal correctly declined to entertain the appeal as time-barred because the IBC contains no provision empowering condonation of such delay, and the tribunal therefore committed no error in refusing admission. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784580 The dominant issue was whether an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 could be entertained despite being filed 132 days late. The SC held that the appellate tribunal correctly declined to entertain the appeal as time-barred because the IBC contains no provision empowering condonation of such delay, and the tribunal therefore committed no error in refusing admission. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784580