<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 341 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784585</link>
    <description>Customs duty deposited after a show cause notice and during investigation was treated as a protest or revenue deposit, so the refund claim was not barred by unjust enrichment. The Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and invoices showed that the duty burden was not included in the sale price or recovered from customers, and mere accounting entry in the profit and loss account was insufficient to prove passing on of incidence. In the absence of contrary evidence from the department, unjust enrichment did not apply and the refund was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 341 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784585</link>
      <description>Customs duty deposited after a show cause notice and during investigation was treated as a protest or revenue deposit, so the refund claim was not barred by unjust enrichment. The Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and invoices showed that the duty burden was not included in the sale price or recovered from customers, and mere accounting entry in the profit and loss account was insufficient to prove passing on of incidence. In the absence of contrary evidence from the department, unjust enrichment did not apply and the refund was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>