<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784586</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether the Commissioner could cancel private bonded warehouse licences and MOOWR permission under s.58B of the Customs Act on grounds that the unit did not meet &quot;private warehouse&quot; requirements and that the activities were allegedly impermissible. CESTAT held that post-Finance Act, 2016, a licence issued under s.58 cannot be cancelled merely because it was allegedly wrongly granted; s.58B permits cancellation only upon contravention of the Act, Rules, or licence conditions, and no such violation was alleged or proved. It further held that neither the Act nor MOOWR, 2019 authorises cancellation based on the nature of goods warehoused or the stated operational objections. The cancellation orders were set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784586</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether the Commissioner could cancel private bonded warehouse licences and MOOWR permission under s.58B of the Customs Act on grounds that the unit did not meet &quot;private warehouse&quot; requirements and that the activities were allegedly impermissible. CESTAT held that post-Finance Act, 2016, a licence issued under s.58 cannot be cancelled merely because it was allegedly wrongly granted; s.58B permits cancellation only upon contravention of the Act, Rules, or licence conditions, and no such violation was alleged or proved. It further held that neither the Act nor MOOWR, 2019 authorises cancellation based on the nature of goods warehoused or the stated operational objections. The cancellation orders were set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>