<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 346 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784590</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was enforcement of an order-in-original directing release of detained gold articles on payment of customs duty, which the customs authorities had not implemented despite the claimant&#039;s willingness to pay. The HC held that release must follow compliance with the order-in-original, and clarified the applicable charges: no warehousing charges could be levied for the period after the order-in-original was passed, while warehousing charges for the earlier period remained payable at the rate applicable on the date of detention, along with other amounts specified in the order-in-original. Upon payment of those amounts, the authorities were directed to release the detained articles, and the application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 346 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784590</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was enforcement of an order-in-original directing release of detained gold articles on payment of customs duty, which the customs authorities had not implemented despite the claimant&#039;s willingness to pay. The HC held that release must follow compliance with the order-in-original, and clarified the applicable charges: no warehousing charges could be levied for the period after the order-in-original was passed, while warehousing charges for the earlier period remained payable at the rate applicable on the date of detention, along with other amounts specified in the order-in-original. Upon payment of those amounts, the authorities were directed to release the detained articles, and the application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>