<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise duty demand over finished-goods shortage and Cenvat credit on steel structures/capital goods overturned; extended limitation rejected</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95825</link>
    <description>Demand of excise duty based solely on shortage of finished goods detected on physical verification was held unsustainable because mere shortage, absent corroborative evidence, does not establish clandestine removal; the demand and allied penalty were set aside. Cenvat credit on steel items used for base structures/shades and related works was held admissible since the contrary Larger Bench view stood overturned and the amended input definition supported credit; denial was set aside. Credit on capital goods received after the unit became operational was allowed as timing of receipt, without dispute on receipt/use, is not a bar. Where the show cause notice invoked the extended period on interpretational issues, extended limitation failed and, the notice being composite, the entire demand (including normal period) was quashed; consequential relief followed. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise duty demand over finished-goods shortage and Cenvat credit on steel structures/capital goods overturned; extended limitation rejected</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95825</link>
      <description>Demand of excise duty based solely on shortage of finished goods detected on physical verification was held unsustainable because mere shortage, absent corroborative evidence, does not establish clandestine removal; the demand and allied penalty were set aside. Cenvat credit on steel items used for base structures/shades and related works was held admissible since the contrary Larger Bench view stood overturned and the amended input definition supported credit; denial was set aside. Credit on capital goods received after the unit became operational was allowed as timing of receipt, without dispute on receipt/use, is not a bar. Where the show cause notice invoked the extended period on interpretational issues, extended limitation failed and, the notice being composite, the entire demand (including normal period) was quashed; consequential relief followed. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>