<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Security cheque presented under commercial loan agreement: no entrustment or misappropriation for s.409 breach of trust; complaint quashed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95824</link>
    <description>Whether presentation of a security cheque under a loan agreement could constitute criminal breach of trust punishable under s.409 IPC turned on proof of entrustment and dishonest misappropriation under ss.405-406 IPC. Since the cheque was voluntarily issued as contractual security in a commercial loan transaction and was meant to be presented on default, it did not involve property entrusted by the complainant to the accused, create any fiduciary relationship, or disclose misappropriation; presentation was in terms of the agreement. The complaint was also treated as a retaliatory, abusive attempt to pre-empt defences in the pending s.138 NI Act proceedings. Summoning and NBW orders were set aside and the complaint was quashed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=876607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Security cheque presented under commercial loan agreement: no entrustment or misappropriation for s.409 breach of trust; complaint quashed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95824</link>
      <description>Whether presentation of a security cheque under a loan agreement could constitute criminal breach of trust punishable under s.409 IPC turned on proof of entrustment and dishonest misappropriation under ss.405-406 IPC. Since the cheque was voluntarily issued as contractual security in a commercial loan transaction and was meant to be presented on default, it did not involve property entrusted by the complainant to the accused, create any fiduciary relationship, or disclose misappropriation; presentation was in terms of the agreement. The complaint was also treated as a retaliatory, abusive attempt to pre-empt defences in the pending s.138 NI Act proceedings. Summoning and NBW orders were set aside and the complaint was quashed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 08:19:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>