https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465743 A composite petition for recognition, enforcement and execution of a foreign award is legally permissible, and a refusal to enforce the award in such a proceeding also defeats the consequential execution relief. An appeal under Section 50(1)(b) lies against the order refusing enforcement against all respondents to the composite proceeding, and a separate order allowing deletion of some respondents is only consequential and does not affect maintainability. The court rejected splitting the challenge into separate proceedings because that would create multiplicity and inconsistent outcomes. The appeal was held maintainable and admitted. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465743 A composite petition for recognition, enforcement and execution of a foreign award is legally permissible, and a refusal to enforce the award in such a proceeding also defeats the consequential execution relief. An appeal under Section 50(1)(b) lies against the order refusing enforcement against all respondents to the composite proceeding, and a separate order allowing deletion of some respondents is only consequential and does not affect maintainability. The court rejected splitting the challenge into separate proceedings because that would create multiplicity and inconsistent outcomes. The appeal was held maintainable and admitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465743