https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465744 The dominant issue was whether the SC should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Art. 136 to grant special leave against the impugned order. The SC held that no ground was made out to warrant interference in Art. 136 jurisdiction. Consequently, the SLP was dismissed and the impugned order was left undisturbed; all pending applications were disposed of. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:50:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465744 The dominant issue was whether the SC should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Art. 136 to grant special leave against the impugned order. The SC held that no ground was made out to warrant interference in Art. 136 jurisdiction. Consequently, the SLP was dismissed and the impugned order was left undisturbed; all pending applications were disposed of. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465744